With Super Rugby taking a break for the June Internationals for the first time, SANZAR can announce that going into the break all three territories were tracking beyond comparative numbers from this time last year.

Sport24

Attendances have been strong, with many fixtures throughout the season setting new records for teams and grounds alike.

SANZAR CEO Greg Peters said this was further proof that Super Rugby was arguably the best international interprovincial competition in world rugby.

“This is the second year Super Rugby has been in its current conference guise with 15 teams, and it is pleasing to note that fans are registering their approval of the new format with record numbers,” Peters said.

“The conference system and increased local derbies are again showing the intense competition within each territory, with grounds, as well as our broadcasting partners revealing some stunning figures.”

“Fox Sports in Australia, Sky Sports in New Zealand and SuperSport in South Africa have been thrilled with viewing numbers this season, and as a result our stakeholders have been pleased that the current format is yielding desired outcomes.”

New Zealand has been seen the biggest growth, with Peters stating that this was exactly the follow on from Rugby World Cup that had been hoped for.

“The Legacy Programme implemented by the New Zealand Rugby Union was designed to capture the effects of hosting the third largest sporting event in the world, and as a consequence New Zealanders are watching the game in record numbers.”

The cumulative figure continues to rise for NZ with 9 916 300 fans tuning into the 100 matches played to date.

While 2011 had one less match played, with 99 matches played by end of Round 15, a total of 7 458 600 tuned in, seeing 2012 with a considerable increase of 32%.

A combined total of 538 959 NZ fans have attended 32 home matches (an average of 16 842 per match) over the first 15 weeks. That is two more matches than the 30 that were played by this time in 2011, with a total of 390 946 (average of 12 217 per match). This represents a 37% increase in average crowds per match.

Australia, the boom performer in 2011, spearheaded by the inaugural championship success of the Brisbane-based Reds, has continued to turn in strong numbers.

“Numbers in Australia have been consistent with the remarkable results achieved in 2011, where the Reds’ title success resulted in new viewing records across the country, while Queensland Rugby has since turned in some great results off the field, maintaining record attendances while shattering membership numbers,” Peters said.

After fifteen rounds a cumulative total of 5 888 000 fans have viewed the 100 Super Rugby matches in Australia. This average is only slightly down 3% on the highs of 2011 and has climbed considerably as the season progresses.

With 34 matches played on home soil, 633 847 Australian fans have attended Super Rugby matches to date (average 18 642 per match). 2011 at Round 15 was one game behind with 33 matches played, but was slightly ahead in the cumulative crowd with 640 910 attending those matches (average of 19 421 per match).

South African viewing numbers continued to increase, while their match attendances were slightly down compared with this time last season – but these figures are likely to change with a host of local derbies to come.

“Once again South Africa continues to pour in strong numbers” Peters said.

“While their numbers are down on this time last season in terms of ground attendance, we expect this figure to jump, especially considering some of the remaining derbies to come in the South African Conference.”

A massive cumulative total of 34 074 497 South African fans have tuned into the 100 matches to date. By the end of Round 15 in 2011, 99 matches had been played with a total of 28 658 402 viewers. While only one game less had been played in 2011, the difference of 5 416 095 is a significant gap and therefore a great increase in viewership for South Africa compared to 2011.

It must also be noted that the SuperSport figures exclude HD viewership. There are over 400 000 HD households in SA, which if measured would add significantly to the viewership numbers.)

A total of 852 838 fans have attended the 32 matches played to date (an average of 26 651 per match). This is two matches less than the 34 that were played by the end of Round 15 in 2011 with a total of 914 249.

There have also been reports of some great viewing numbers in the United Kingdom, with BSkyB reporting an average of 35 000 live in-home viewers per Super Rugby match.

Peters said that the second stage of the 2012 Super Rugby season would only build the momentum seen over the first 15 rounds.

“With three rounds still to play, we have nine teams still in Super Rugby finals series calculations, a heady group including the defending champions, three former Super Rugby winners, and a collection of other contenders who have exceeded expectations this season,” Peters said.

“What will make the run home special are the local derbies and that any team is capable of beating any other and upsetting the finals series contenders.”

8 Responses to Super Rugby: Popularity increasing

  • 1

    Hello GBS thats interesting for a competition that folks have been complaining about – goes on too long, teams don’t all play each other; strange format ensuring all countries get a team in the semi-finals… yet the organizers say its becoming more popular with the numbers up. It seems the biggest increase is to TV audience, I do wonder how they get these numbers? The attendance of actual games a bit more in NZ but down in Aus and SA, but I guess with lots of ‘derbies’ to be played in the last 3 rounds these numbers should go up too.

  • 2

    Just under 6 million people are said to have watched the games on TV in Aus and around 7.5 million in NZ but in SA its over 34 million, this is a huge difference in numbers for TV advertising etc, how does the revenue shared from the TV deals between the 3 countries compare, I’m sure it does not reflect this massive difference. Interesting though to note is the difference between crowd attendance in Aus and SA is not as large, is this because folk in Aus can afford to go to the games more than those in SA? Would be interesting to see how prices compare to go watch a game in each country.

  • 3

    Bullscot

    34 million….that is an outrageous number. I really doubt that is southafrican tv audience.

    Their are only 6 million whites and it is safe to say that those who watch rugby will watch rugger. The black population is bast but giben most dont own a tv and rugby not on free to air the 34million is baffling. I think supersport are integrating subsrciptions to viewers. South africa is fortunate due to proximity that they can gain the african market.

  • 4

    Should say those who are connected to supersport and are rugger fans will watch the rugby.

    In aus most people have free to air and the viewing is generally good so households dont get fox. In south africa it is widely known you need to get dstv as free to air does not match up.

  • 5

    How many saffas actually tune in to watch rugby…where is that stat.

  • 6

    good to ear, hope that rugby union will grow even more in Aus and gain some ground from the other two rugby wannabe genres

  • 7

    3@ Wallabie.:
    That seems to be 34 million in total over the 100 games played in this years Super 15 at time of article Wallabie so that works out at around 340 000 viewers per game estimated in SA, quite a believable number if thats what the numbers mean. Now compared to Aus just under 6 million for 100 games – that is a viewership of less than 60 000 per game in Aus, so the point I raise and ask again is this the same proportion to the amount of money each country gets from the TV deals and I think the answer is no, from these numbers it would appear that Aus get a far greater proportion off the TV deal than their viewership numbers suggest they should , what do you think. You also say that in Aus most folks just watch free to air TV rather than get Fox, so then is the rugby on pay TV and if it is then if folk mostly have free TV then doesn’t this highlight a degree of apathy towards the rugby in Aus and again should they get as much TV money as they do?

  • 8

    Bullscot

    Maybe it is apathy and more money in afl, sorka, nrl and cricket…..and there is advertising and viewership to get these games free to air. Rugby is a snobs sport and rugby union has not tried too hard in the past to get it too the masses.

    Just like the currie cup has a very strong historical foundation in south africa so does cricket, afl and nrl have its equivalent in aus. Afl matches easily get 36 000 people to its matches…thats the average attendances.

Users Online

Total 144 users including 0 member, 144 guests, 0 bot online

Most users ever online were 3735, on 31 August 2022 @ 6:23 pm