2nd Test: South Africa vs India
India 205 & 228
South Africa 131 & 215
India wins the Test by 87 runs
SA vs India – Full Score Card:
| |
|
South Africa v India Played at Kingsmead, Durban, from 26 Dec to 29 Dec 2010
| South Africa 2nd innings |
| Batting |
R |
B |
4s |
6s |
| Graeme Smith |
c Dhoni b Sreesanth |
37 |
38 |
5 |
0 |
| Alviro Petersen |
c Pujara b Harbhajan |
26 |
45 |
4 |
0 |
| Hashim Amla |
c Dhoni b Sreesanth |
16 |
16 |
3 |
0 |
| Jacques Kallis |
c Sehwag b Sreesanth |
17 |
52 |
2 |
0 |
| AB de Villiers |
lbw b Harbhajan |
33 |
76 |
0 |
1 |
| Ashwell Prince |
not out |
39 |
108 |
3 |
0 |
| Mark Boucher |
lbw b Khan |
1 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
| Dale Steyn |
c Pujara b Khan |
10 |
24 |
2 |
0 |
| PL Harris |
b Khan |
7 |
28 |
0 |
0 |
| Morne Morkel |
c Dhoni b Sharma |
20 |
47 |
3 |
0 |
| LL Tsotsobe |
run out (Pujara) |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
| Extras |
(lb 1, nb 8) |
9 |
|
|
|
| Total |
(10 wickets; 72.3 overs) |
215 |
|
|
|
| Fall of wickets |
| 1-63 (Smith, 12.1 ov); 2-82 (Petersen, 15.4 ov); 3-82 (HM Amla, 16.2 ov); 4-123 (Kallis, 34.2 ov); 5-136 (de Villiers, 39.6 ov); 6-143 (Boucher, 42.4 ov); 7-155 (Steyn, 48.5 ov); 8-182 (Harris, 60.2 ov); 9-215 (Morkel, 72.1 ov); 10-215 (Tsotsobe, 72.3 ov) |
|
|
Result: India won by 87 runs
India 205 & 228
South Africa 131 & 215
Toss: South Africa elected to field
Umpires: Asad Rauf, Steve Davis
Third-umpire: Johanes Cloete
Referee: Andy Pycroft |
| Bowling |
O |
M |
R |
W |
| Khan |
17 |
3 |
57 |
3 |
| Sharma |
11.3 |
0 |
36 |
1 |
| Sreesanth |
14 |
2 |
45 |
3 |
| Harbhajan |
29 |
5 |
70 |
2 |
| Tendulkar |
1 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
|
|
| India 2nd innings |
| Batting |
R |
B |
4s |
6s |
| V Sehwag |
c Boucher b Tsotsobe |
32 |
31 |
6 |
0 |
| M Vijay |
c HM Amla b M Morkel |
9 |
27 |
1 |
0 |
| R Dravid |
c Boucher b Tsotsobe |
2 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
| SR Tendulkar |
c de Villiers b Steyn |
6 |
10 |
1 |
0 |
| VVS Laxman |
c Boucher b Steyn |
96 |
171 |
12 |
0 |
| CA Pujara |
b M Morkel |
10 |
56 |
1 |
0 |
| MS Dhoni |
c Boucher b Tsotsobe |
21 |
35 |
4 |
0 |
| Harbhajan Singh |
c Kallis b M Morkel |
4 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
| Z Khan |
c de Villiers b Harris |
27 |
63 |
4 |
0 |
| I Sharma |
c HM Amla b Kallis |
0 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
| S Sreesanth |
not out |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
| Extras |
(b 8, lb 4, w 9) |
21 |
|
|
|
| Total |
(10 wickets; 70.5 overs) |
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Bowling |
O |
M |
R |
W |
| Steyn |
15.5 |
1 |
60 |
2 |
| M Morkel |
15 |
1 |
47 |
3 |
| Tsotsobe |
13 |
3 |
43 |
3 |
| Kallis |
13 |
2 |
30 |
1 |
| Harris |
14 |
2 |
36 |
1 |
| Fall of wickets |
| 1-42 (Sehwag, 9.1 ov); 2-44 (Vijay, 10.3 ov); 3-48 (Dravid, 11.2 ov); 4-56 (Tendulkar, 14.1 ov); 5-93 (Pujara, 31.5 ov); 6-141 (Dhoni, 41.6 ov); 7-148 (Harbhajan, 44.1 ov); 8-218 (Khan, 63.4 ov); 9-223 (Sharma, 68.5 ov); 10-228 (Laxman, 70.5 ov) |
|
|
| South Africa 1st innings |
| Batting |
R |
B |
4s |
6s |
| Alviro Petersen |
b Khan |
24 |
39 |
3 |
0 |
| Graeme Smith |
c Dhoni b Khan |
9 |
11 |
2 |
0 |
| Hashim Amla |
lbw b Harbhajan |
33 |
46 |
5 |
0 |
| Jacques Kallis |
run out (Sharma) |
10 |
17 |
2 |
0 |
| AB de Villiers |
c Dhoni b Sreesanth |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
| Ashwell Prince |
b Khan |
13 |
46 |
2 |
0 |
| Mark Boucher |
not out |
16 |
24 |
2 |
0 |
| Dale Steyn |
c Dravid b Harbhajan |
1 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
| PL Harris |
c Pujara b Harbhajan |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
| Morne Morkel |
c Harbhajan b Sharma |
10 |
30 |
1 |
0 |
| LL Tsotsobe |
c Vijay b Harbhajan |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
| Extras |
(lb 2, w 1, nb 12) |
15 |
|
|
|
| Total |
(10 wickets; 37.2 overs) |
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Bowling |
O |
M |
R |
W |
| Khan |
13 |
2 |
36 |
3 |
| Sreesanth |
8 |
0 |
41 |
1 |
| Sharma |
9 |
2 |
42 |
1 |
| Harbhajan |
7.2 |
2 |
10 |
4 |
| Fall of wickets |
| 1-23 (Smith, 4.6 ov); 2-46 (Petersen, 10.3 ov); 3-67 (Kallis, 15.2 ov); 4-74 (de Villiers, 16.4 ov); 5-96 (HM Amla, 25.1 ov); 6-100 (Prince, 26.4 ov); 7-103 (Steyn, 29.1 ov); 8-103 (Harris, 29.6 ov); 9-127 (Morkel, 36.4 ov); 10-131 (Tsotsobe, 37.2 ov) |
|
|
| India 1st innings |
| Batting |
R |
B |
4s |
6s |
| V Sehwag |
c Kallis b Steyn |
25 |
32 |
4 |
0 |
| M Vijay |
c Boucher b Steyn |
19 |
42 |
2 |
0 |
| R Dravid |
c Boucher b Steyn |
25 |
68 |
3 |
0 |
| SR Tendulkar |
c Kallis b Tsotsobe |
13 |
22 |
3 |
0 |
| VVS Laxman |
c Tsotsobe b Steyn |
38 |
73 |
4 |
1 |
| CA Pujara |
c Boucher b Tsotsobe |
19 |
45 |
3 |
0 |
| MS Dhoni |
c Petersen b Steyn |
35 |
57 |
3 |
1 |
| Harbhajan Singh |
c de Villiers b Steyn |
21 |
39 |
2 |
0 |
| Z Khan |
c Boucher b M Morkel |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
| I Sharma |
not out |
1 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
| S Sreesanth |
c Boucher b M Morkel |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
| Extras |
(b 1, lb 2, w 4, nb 2) |
9 |
|
|
|
| Total |
(10 wickets; 65.1 overs) |
205 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Bowling |
O |
M |
R |
W |
| Steyn |
19 |
6 |
50 |
6 |
| M Morkel |
19.1 |
3 |
68 |
2 |
| Tsotsobe |
11 |
3 |
40 |
2 |
| Kallis |
8 |
2 |
18 |
0 |
| Harris |
8 |
1 |
26 |
0 |
| Fall of wickets |
| 1-43 (Sehwag, 10.4 ov); 2-48 (Vijay, 12.5 ov); 3-79 (Tendulkar, 19.5 ov); 4-117 (Dravid, 36.6 ov); 5-130 (Laxman, 40.6 ov); 6-156 (Pujara, 49.4 ov); 7-190 (Harbhajan, 60.2 ov); 8-193 (Khan, 61.6 ov); 9-205 (Dhoni, 64.5 ov); 10-205 (Sreesanth, 65.1 ov) |
|
|
|
| South Africa team |
| GC Smith*, AN Petersen, JH Kallis, HM Amla, AB de Villiers, AG Prince, MV Boucher†, LL Tsotsobe, PL Harris, DW Steyn, M Morkel |
| |
India team |
| M Vijay, V Sehwag, R Dravid, SR Tendulkar, VVS Laxman, MS Dhoni*†, CA Pujara, I Sharma, Z Khan, Harbhajan Singh, S Sreesanth |
4th Test: Australia v England
Australia 98 & 258 (85.4 ov)
England 513 (159.1.0 ov)
England won by an innings and 157 runs
T20 – International
Pakistan 143/9 (20 ov)
New Zealand 146/5 (17.1/20 ov)
New Zealand won by 5 wickets (with 17 balls remaining)
Australia vs England
Preview
England still have the upper hand going into the final two Tests of an enthralling Ashes series, needing only one more victory to retain the coveted urn against Australia.
Australia go into Sunday’s fourth Melbourne Test fuelled by the momentum from their emphatic 267-run victory in Perth, which levelled the series at 1-1. But they cannot afford a slip-up in the last two matches.
“We always talk about the last two Tests in a series being where things are won and lost,” England skipper Andrew Strauss said on Friday.
“The first few games set it up and the last couple bring it home. That is the challenge for us.”
England looked poised for their first series triumph Down Under since 1986-87 after an innings victory in the second Adelaide Test, before Ricky Ponting’s team hit back spectacularly in the third Test at the WACA.
Teams:
Australia: SR Watson, PJ Hughes, RT Ponting (capt), MJ Clarke, MEK Hussey, BJ Haddin (wk), SPD Smith, MG Johnson, RJ Harris, PM Siddle, BW Hilfenhaus
England: AJ Strauss (capt), AN Cook, IJL Trott, KP Pietersen, PD Collingwood, IR Bell, MJ Prior (wk), TT Bresnan, GP Swann, JM Anderson, CT Tremlett
Day 1 report
AUSTRALIA’S Ashes campaign is terminally ill after a humiliating opening day to the fourth Test at the MCG.
Before a bumper Boxing Day crowd of 84,345 the Australians were sent in and skittled for 98 – the only time they have been dismissed for under under three figures in the first innings of an Ashes Test – and were then made to look innocuous with the ball as England romped to 0-157 in reply by stumps.
It proved the perfect day for England captain Andrew Strauss.
He won the toss and his seamers destroyed the brittle Australian batting before he cruised to 64 not out in yet an
bullscot @ 120
yeah, i also feel gutted about that loss … well, we can just hope that the icc makes it mind up about the referrals … if they cant do that at this point in time, then let the home team decide whether they want it or not and inform their opponents accordingly within reasonable time until the icc have done their homework on the system and can then decide around it!!
this second test, and really the two poor decision on day four, have shown that we need a system that can reverse such poor decisions!
opinion from someone on supersport’s site (i’m using it because he express what i tried to say very well)
..
……”India played well, and while I cant sit here and say that SA DESERVED to win, I CAN say that without the dodgey calls, they would’ve had the opportunity to…and then it would’ve been a great fight.
In my opinion, the ONLY reason you would choose to not use the referral system, would be if you are sure that it works against you. And if it works against you, it must mean that without it, you are getting the benefits of bad calls. If you are supposed to be best in the world, why choose to hide behind bad calls?”
122@ Ashley:
Etzakkerly!!
Check, ek het oppie WP Truitjie Thread vir jou boodskap gelos.
Users Online
Total 129 users including 0 member, 129 guests, 0 bot online
Most users ever online were 3735, on 31 August 2022 @ 6:23 pm