ChiefsBluesChiefs (20) 32 / 20 (13) Blues (Final Score)

The Chiefs and Blues did battle in Super Rugby at

Yarrow Stadium, Taranaki at 09:35 SA Time (19:35 NZ Time, 07:35 GMT).

This was the live match discussion Article.

The match was broadcast LIVE on SuperSport 1, SHD & CSN on TV in SA.

*******************

Scorers:

Chiefs:

  • Penalties – Gareth Anscombe (2)
  • Drop Goals – 0
  • Tries – Ben Tameifuna (2), Tim Nanai-Williams (1), Tom Marshall (1)
  • Conversions – Gareth Anscome (3)

Blues:

  • Penalties – Simon Hickey (2)
  • Drop Goals – 0
  • Tries – Lolagi Visinia (1), George Moala (1)
  • Conversions – Simon Hickey (1), Ihaia West (1)

Teams:

Chiefs

Blues

09 May at 09:35
  • Team: 15. Tom Marshall, 14. Dwayne Sweeney, 13. Tim Nanai-Williams, 12. Bundee Aki, 11. James Lowe, 10. Gareth Anscombe, 9. Tawera Kerr-Barlow, 8. Liam Messam (Captain), 7. Sam Cane, 6. Tanerau Latimer, 5. Brodie Retallick, 4. Michael Fitzgerald, 3. Ben Tameifuna, 2. Nathan Harris, 1. Pauliasi Manu
  • Replacements: 16. Mahonri Schwalger, 17. Jamie MacKintosh, 18. Josh Hohneck, 19. Matt Symons, 20. Liam Squire, 21. Brad Weber, 22. Andrew Horrell, 23. Anton Lienert-Brown
  • Team: 15. Charles Piutau, 14. Frank Halai, 13. George Moala, 12. Ma’a Nonu, 11. Lolagi Visinia, 10. Simon Hickey, 9. Bryn Hall, 8. Jerome Kaino, 7. Brendon O’Connor, 6. Peter Saili, 5. Tom Donnelly, 4. Patrick Tuipulotu, 3. Charlie Faumuina, 2. Keven Mealamu (Captain), 1. Tony Woodcock, 0. Pita Ahki
  • Replacements: 16. James Parsons, 17 Sam Prattley, 18 Angus Ta’avao, 19 Hayden Triggs, 20 Steven Luatua, 21 Piri Weepu, 22 Ihaia West, 23 Pita Ahki

Referee: Mike Fraser (New Zealand)
Assistant Referees: Nick Briant (New Zealand), Shane McDermott (New Zealand)
TMO: Glenn Newman (New Zealand)

101 Responses to Super Rugby: Chiefs vs Blues – Live Game Article

  • 91

    superBul wrote:

    @ Pietman:
    73
    Koos Kieck, Rankin lui die name n klokkie

    Nee, kan nie onthou nie, onthou net De Wet, opleidings-pilot.

  • 92

    88 @ superBul:
    Weetie wat dit is nie, is net jammer, mens moes die ANC net onder 50% kon gehou het in Gauteng.

    Sien die DA is hier net oor 58% in die Weskaap… en die res van die land is ANC s’n met nagenoeg 2 derde meerderhede of net meer of net minder oral.

    Overall is dit ANC met sowat 62%, gelukkig te min vir 2 derdes meerderheid.

  • 93

    @ grootblousmile:
    @92 Ja,gelukkig noggie nie 2/3, dan het hulle ons kaal geroof.
    Maar al die provinsies met kukemmers en slaggate stem groot ANC, hoe werk dit, lyk my daai lot in O.Kaap, Limpopo, Mamparalande en NW hou van ellende?

  • 94

    OK bye ek gaan shop toe

  • 95

    superBul wrote:

    OK bye ek gaan shop toe

    Kom terug Blommie! Cry

  • 96

    93 @ Pietman:
    Ja, lykmy hoe minder geleerdheid en armer ‘n provinsie oor die algemeen het of is, hoe beter vaar die ANC en hoe meer welvaart en geleerdheid (Weskaap en Gauteng), hoe meer gematig en hoe gelyker is die syfers.

  • 97

    @ grootblousmile:
    @97 Dis die probleem met one man one vote, dit gee jou nie noodwendig’ regering deur die bestes’ (aristokrasie) nie (Sokrates het dit al in die antieke tye gekritiseer).
    Gevolglik het die werklose verkragter in n plakkerskamp dieselfde stemreg as jy wat eiendom besit en belasting betaal; maar hulle is slim genoeg om dit te omseil met “previously disadvanced” logika.
    Ons benodig gekealifiseerde stemreg, soos in Switzerland…dink ek.

  • 98

    97 @ Pietman:
    Ons sal nooit so iets hier kan kry nie, die “Haves” en “Have Nots” kwessie sal altyd opspring… hulle wil juis die vote kry by en van die “Have Nots” om hulle magsbasis rondom te bou.

    Interessante sisteem wat Switserland het, met Parlementêre representasie nie volgens area nie maar volgens Party se persentasie van die stemme.

  • 99

    grootblousmile wrote:

    97 @ Pietman:
    Ons sal nooit so iets hier kan kry nie, die “Haves” en “Have Nots” kwessie sal altyd opspring… hulle wil juis die vote kry by en van die “Have Nots” om hulle magsbasis rondom te bou.
    Interessante sisteem wat Switserland het, met Parlementêre representasie nie volgens area nie maar volgens Party se persentasie van die stemme.

    @ grootblousmile:
    Ja, kantonstelsel.

  • 100

    99 @ Pietman:
    Ja… en die woord waarna ek gesoek het was “Proportional Representation”.

  • 101

    100 @ grootblousmile:
    I am a big fan of Proportional Representation, because a person’s vote becomes more equal, whereas in an Area-bound System, you have voting areas with much fewer voters and areas with a huge number of voters… each area voting for only 1 representative.

    Thus, in an Area bound System, in the area with fewer voters, your vote literally actually counts more than your vote would in a voter number loaded area.

    In a Proportional System, that inequality is eliminated.

Users Online

Total 48 users including 0 member, 48 guests, 0 bot online

Most users ever online were 3735, on 31 August 2022 @ 6:23 pm