ABSA Currie Cup

Currie Cup Premier Division Unions

Cell C Sharks




Xerox Golden Lions


Free State Cheetahs


Vodacom Blue Bulls


GWK Griquas Logo


EP Kings


Steval Pumas

Click on any of the pictures to go to that Union

MTN LionsSouthern KingsSo the long awaited “non-grudge” game between South Africa’s newest Super Rugby franchise and the team they displaced has come and gone, with the Lions winning the game on the score board.

But who were the real winners on the day and why?

Here’s my personal take on it all:

Sitting in the stands witching this game, one had the feeling that the vast majority of Lions’ supporters were expecting a “big” win.

After all, their team had played 3 games together and the opposition had named a largely unknown team for what they (the Kings) were touting as nothing more than a Super Rugby warm-up game.

The rest of the South African Rugby public however, were touting it as a “grudge” match.

The Lions supporters came out literally in their thousands with more than 18 000 spectators at the game, the majority of them Lions supporters. I did however notice at least 10 Kings supporters as I was making my way to the Media Area to sign in before joining my wife and kids in the stands.

So, after a game which was still in the balance with 15 minutes to play, who were the real winners and losers in this game?

Well, despite what both Unions were saying prior to the game, this was no ordinary “warm-up” friendly. The Lions desperately wanted a “good” win, while the Kings in all likelihood wanted to defuse a potential disaster. Probably the reason why the Kings chose what was in effect a second string outfit.

The Lions started off like their lives’ depended on it, but refusing a shot at goal from an early penalty indicated an almost one minded approach.

The home team were shocked early after the Kings ran a ball in easily for an early try to silence the home crowd.

For the rest of the first stanza the Lions seemed to be in control, but their old problem of losing the ball in the contact area rose to the fore once again.

The Kings backline seemed somewhat ineffective at getting across the advantage line on the occasions when they had the ball in hand, but they did manage the tackle area quite effectively.

The Lions set piece in the first half was far superior to that of the Kings, with the scrum being a particular sign of worry for the Eastern Cape franchise, as well as an inability to stop or control the Lions’ rolling mauls.

The Lions seemed well positioned going into the break, and on the stands the mood was bullish (pardon the pun) to say the least.

HOWEVER, the second half was another story completely.

The Lions old inability to play for 80 minutes resurfaced. The defence around the rucks and mauls dropped to a level just below that of the club game that was played as a curtain raiser, a problem that has been one of their downfalls at Super Rugby level for the last 5 years, and the general ability to control ball in hand went out of the window.

It’s just not good enough from a team who want to show the Rugby world that they deserve to be in the sports toughest team competition.

For the Kings, half back Johan Herbst especially took advantage of the poor defence and strolled through for a brace of tries without a hand being laid on him.

His general play was also good with his service to his back line crisp and clean.

He certainly shouldn’t be out of his depth at Super Rugby level, and I’m sure will be targeted by some of the “bigger” franchises soon should his form continue in the same vain.

I was also impressed by Hadleigh Parkes in the centre who had an industrious game showing a lot of heart and ability on defence.

A major concern though for the Kings though must surely be the quality of their forward pack, who struggled throughout the game, especially in the set phases.

Their scrum was destroyed by the Lions in the first stanza, and only looked better (in my opinion) in the second because of the overzealous use of substitutes by Lions coach Johan Ackerman.

The Kings line out was also not really up to Super Rugby standards, and will I’m sure be targeted by the stronger franchises throughout the Super Rugby campaign.

From the stands, the only player who seemed to stand out in the Kings pack was Adongo who was certainly busy after coming on as a substitute.

There can however be no doubt that their pack will be considerably strengthened by the inclusion of players like Luke Watson and Bandiso Maku, and the backs by the return of the likes of Waylon Murray.

All in all though, in my opinion, the Kings can feel the more satisfied of the two camps. The fact that they were only outscored by ten points in a game where they were widely expect to be on the wrong side of a hiding can actually be considered a positive given the team they fielded.

There can be little doubt that they are going to find the going very tough in their first season of Super Rugby, and will, I’m sure be on the wrong side of some heavy defeats, BUT if they can gel as a unit, gain some sort of form and possibly win a game or two on the way, there is no doubt that they will be a very difficult team to beat should it come down to a promotion / relegation series against the Lions later in the season.

For the Lions, well I think this game may have produced more questions than answers for the coaching and management team, who I’m sure must be more than a little disappointed with the final result.

While the Kings will be facing consistently strong opposition throughout the Super Rugby series, the same cannot be said for the Lions, who‘s games will in all likelihood be against weakened clubs and representative selections.

From the Lions point of view, they will be hoping that the Kings have an arduous and difficult Super Rugby campaign with the degree and quantity of injuries that normally go with it.

The Kings will be hoping that as a squad they continue to gel and grow as a group, and will hope that the squad comes through the campaign with the minimum amount of injuries.

Either way, if the promotion / relegation series takes place, it could be a couple of exciting games.

In conclusion then, despite the result on the scoreboard, in my opinion this “bout” was won by the Kings on a split points decision.

Well done to them. Lions, you have to up your game.

Also as a personal opinion, on Saturday’s display, I don’t think that either of these two sides are good enough to compete for any honours in the Super Rugby competition, and given the history of SA sides in Super Rugby, probably never will be.

As for the referee Mr Jonker, He seemed to miss a lot and seemed to be a little inconsistent in his handling of the game, and I’ll leave it at that.

Finally 2 points I’d like to make, not really about the game, but concerning the game.


1. I’ve always been quick to criticise the Lions whenever the management team have acted in a way that I personally consider to be of a standard below what is expected and I’m now going to do so with the Kings.

It is TOTALLY unacceptable for a so called professional sporting organisation to fail to submit a Team Sheet in time for it to be included in the match day program.

It may not seem like a big deal, but the PAYING PUBLIC who have to dish out their hard earned cash, even if it is only R10 for a program, have a right to know who they’re paying to see, even if it is only a “friendly”!

You’re competing in a professional environment, please act in a professional manner.


2. My second piece of criticism surrounds our South African Rugby broadcaster, SuperSport / DSTV.

You continually refer to the matches organised by the Lions as “SA Franchise Challenge” matches.

They are not. They form part of the “MTN Lions Challenge”. Get it right please.

15 Responses to Lions vs Kings: The real Losers and Winners

  • 1

    Losing by 9 points against basically a Vodacom Cup side of the team who finished last the previous year in the Super rugby competition… Yeah that’s a big win for the Kings…

  • 2

    @ vanStraaten:
    The Kings were a team with virtually NO SUPER Rugby or Currie Cup premier division experience on the day.

    Believe me, the Lions expected to win BIG.

    Had they not let in some easy tries, the result would have looked good, but for the Lions a 10 point win against a team of Currie Cup First Division and Vodacom Cup players just isn’t good enough.

    The Lions probably tried too hard which caused errors to creep in, but on this day, ESPECIALLY THIS DAY, they should have been more composed and clinical in their execution.

  • 3

    The Lions challenge is not really challenging the Lions. It looks like they are just going through the motions. Nothing really to play for. This might be a problem going into the promo/relegation matches. If you took all the games easy during the year and then suddenly, for a game or two you want to lift the tempo, then mistakes creep in.

  • 4

    Plus the Lions have a few players out in the field that would strengthen the team in critical areas. Franco Van Der Merwe for example…

  • 5

    GBS, Thanks for fixing the pics.

  • 6

    5 @ Scrumdown:
    No problem!

    Power is still out in the whole bloody Brakkenjanpan, so I’ve brought my Notebook to Benoni to Integrity Funerals… and am now doing the most needed from here….

  • 7

    @ leon:
    I have to disagree. Besides playing for pride, the guys are also playing for Springbok selections, being noticed by talent scouts, and against the SA teams, playing to prove a point. I have to agree with Scrumdown, that they did not do themselves a favour by only winningby 10 points. I was hoping for a big win, and I think the players let themselves down on Saturday

  • 8

    Pre season is always a bad barometer of things to come, so really, it’s a case of seeing how strong the Lions are come playoffs (if they happen) vs how much the Kings squad will have taken from their chance in the big leagues.

  • 9

    So where can I get a team sheet of Kings players as part of my info for Fantasy rugby competition?

  • 10

    Scrumdown a good article Thanks.

    See what another website says about the Kings chances.

    2013 is set to be a long, tough debut season for the newest, and most controversial, addition to Super Rugby. Doubters have been proved wrong before, but don’t bet your house on the Kings winning any trophies.

    Last Year: The Kings weren’t part of the 2012 season but they were never far from the headlines. Eventually SARU were forced to make good on their promises to the South African government that the Eastern Cape would get a Super Rugby franchise, and the subsequent axing of the Lions will go down as one of the biggest travesties of sporting justice the game has ever seen. The prolonged wrangle – and the eventual decision to set up a promotion-relegation clashes at the end of this season – affected the ability of both the Kings and Lions to secure contracts with key players, which was always going to be necessary since the EP Currie Cup squad fell way short of the quality and depth needed to compete at this level.

    This year: Joining the rugby world’s longest, most attritional competition has historically been a tough task. The Rebels and Force are still struggling to claw their way up the hierarchy. The Kings’ uncertain future beyond this season has meant that top quality players are not flocking toward Port Elizabeth and the squad looks very short on firepower, especially up front. If the Kings pack regularly gets a thrashing – which many pundits are predicting – keeping morale up with be hard and avoiding the wooden spoon will be a near-impossible task. If results fail to come and fans stay away as a consequence, the objective of building the game in the Eastern Cape will suffer too. Their draw is a tough one. The Kings start with probably their easiest game of the year but then host last year’s finalists on consecutive weekends before embarking on their first tour of New Zealand and Australia. Squad depth has always been vital in this competition and the Kings are looking rather thin. Trips to Loftus and Kings Park in the last few weeks could turn ugly.

    Players to watch: Former Toulouse team-mates Virgile Lacombe and Nicolas Vergalo will add some vital experience at hooker and scrum-half respectively. Unfortunately, two-time Heineken Cup-winner Lacombe has already signed a deal to return to France to play for Racing Métro next season. Argentina international Vergallo is likely to hang around hoping to set a trend for his countrymen who have ambitions to play in the Rugby Championship. No need to introduce skipper Luke Watson, who has been making headlines in South Africa for years, but not always for the right reasons. Reports coming out of PE suggest that the son of the province’s president is suffering from big-fish-in-a-small-pond syndrome. Watson is a quality player and the Kings will need him to do plenty of hard graft, not just be the hero looking to score tries off the back of mauls.

    Noteworthy signings: Tomás Leonardi (Argentina); Daniel Adongo (Kenya, Countie Manukau); Demetri Catrakilis (Western Province); Ronnie Cooke (Grenoble); Virgile Lacombe (Toulouse); Bandise Maku (Lions); Waylon Murray (Lions); Michael Killian (Lions); Andries Strauss (Cheetahs); Steven Sykes (from Sharks); Nicolás Vergallo (Toulouse)

    Prospects: Not good. Don’t surprised if the Kings finish the season without a win. In theory, their best chance of victory would be at home to the Force, but that game is their opening fixture so they wouldn’t have had the kind of game time required to get a newly-assembled team functioning as a cohesive unit. The Rebels would be another target but the fixture in Melbourne comes at the end of a month-long overseas trip, which starts in Christchurch where a hiding is on the cards. The Kings’ most important games of the year are set to be the two-leg relegation-promotion clashes with Lions. It remains to be seen what shape their squad will be in come late July.

  • 11

    9 @ ozziekiwi:
    Look here on Rugby-Talk itself, under the Header Graphics Banner, there is a Menu, go to Super Rugby, then to 2013, then to 2013 Super Rugby Squads and then go click on the Southern Kings players… you’ll find all the info right there!

  • 12

    Thanks gbs. I have been there and made copious notes but I’m really after who played in the Lions game. Any sources you are aware of?

  • 13

    12 @ ozziekiwi:
    We had a full Live Game Article for the Game itself… with both teams sheets.

    Here’s the link to that article: http://www.rugby-talk.com/2013/02/mtn-lions-challenge-mtn-lions-vs-southern-kings-live-game-article-ko-at-1445-sa-time/

  • 14

    The Kings have named all five of their foreigners in their final 35-man Super Rugby squad.

  • 15

    The Kings have ignored Saru’s ruling that South African franchises may only have two foreigners in their Super Rugby squads.

    Argentine duo, flanker Tomas Leonardi and scrumhalf Nicolas Vergallo, Kiwi utility back Hadleigh Parkes, French hooker Virgile Lacombe and Kenyan forward Daniel Adongo have all been included in the Kings squad.

    More to follow…

    Kings squad:

    Forwards – Schalk Ferrreira, Jaco Engels, Hannes Franklin, Virgile Lacombe, Bandise Maku, Edgar Marutlulle, Kevin Buys, Grant Kemp, Steven Sykes, David Bullbring, Darron Nell, Rynier Bernardo, Daniel Adongo, Wimpie van der Walt, Mpho Mbiyozo, Tomas Leonardi, Cornell du Preez, Devin Oosthuizen, Luke Watson (captain), Jacques Engelbrecht.
    Backs – Shaun Venter, Johan Herbst, Nicolas Vergallo, Demetri Catrakillis, George Whitehead, Andries Strauss, Hadleigh Parkes, Ronnie Cooke, Waylon Murray, Michael Killian, Sergeal Petersen, Marcello Sampson, Siyanda Grey, SP Marais, Elric van Vuuren.


Bam Advert

Bornman Graphic