South Africa and New Zealand did battle in the 2nd ODI at De Beers Oval, Kimberley on Tuesday 22 January 2013.
This was the Live Game Article for the match.
South Africa won the toss and elected to field.
New Zealand won the game by 27 runs, bowling South Africa out with the first ball of the last over.
New Zealand: 279 / 8 (50 overs)
South Africa: 252 All Out (49.1 overs)
New Zealand won by 27 runs
- New Zealand in South Africa ODI Series – 2nd ODI
- ODI no. 3325 | 2012/13 season
- Played at De Beers Diamond Oval, Kimberley
- 22 January 2013 – day/night (50-over match)
| New Zealand innings (50 overs maximum) | R | M | B | 4s | 6s | SR | ||
| MJ Guptill | c du Plessis b Kleinveldt | 0 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| BJ Watling | lbw b Morkel | 12 | 53 | 33 | 2 | 0 | 36.36 | |
| KS Williamson | not out | 145 | 207 | 136 | 17 | 1 | 106.61 | |
| GD Elliott | c †de Kock b Kleinveldt | 48 | 84 | 63 | 5 | 0 | 76.19 | |
| BB McCullum*† | b Morkel | 17 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 170.00 | |
| C Munro | c Ingram b Tsotsobe | 9 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 69.23 | |
| JEC Franklin | b Tsotsobe | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| JDS Neesham | run out (du Plessis/Tsotsobe) | 5 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 125.00 | |
| NL McCullum | c Tsotsobe b Morkel | 19 | 27 | 23 | 1 | 0 | 82.60 | |
| KD Mills | not out | 15 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 214.28 | |
| Extras | (lb 4, w 5) | 9 | ||||||
| Total | (8 wickets; 50 overs; 218 mins) | 279 | (5.58 runs per over) | |||||
| Did not bat MJ McClenaghan |
| Fall of wickets 1-0 (Guptill, 2.4 ov), 2-32 (Watling, 12.3 ov), 3-159 (Elliott, 33.5 ov), 4-188 (BB McCullum, 36.5 ov), 5-201 (Munro, 39.4 ov), 6-202 (Franklin, 39.6 ov), 7-211 (Neesham, 41.3 ov), 8-245 (NL McCullum, 47.4 ov) |
| Bowling | O | M | R | W | Econ | |||
| RK Kleinveldt | 10 | 2 | 45 | 2 | 4.50 | (1w) | ||
| LL Tsotsobe | 10 | 2 | 38 | 2 | 3.80 | (1w) | ||
| M Morkel | 10 | 1 | 71 | 3 | 7.10 | (1w) | ||
| R McLaren | 8 | 0 | 57 | 0 | 7.12 | (2w) | ||
| RJ Peterson | 9 | 0 | 45 | 0 | 5.00 | |||
| F du Plessis | 3 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 6.33 |
| South Africa innings (target: 280 runs from 50 overs) | R | M | B | 4s | 6s | SR | ||
| Q de Kock† | b Mills | 25 | 37 | 28 | 1 | 2 | 89.28 | |
| GC Smith | run out (Franklin/†BB McCullum) | 66 | 75 | 8 | 0 | 88.00 | ||
| CA Ingram | c Watling b NL McCullum | 79 | 94 | 10 | 0 | 84.04 | ||
| F du Plessis* | run out (NL McCullum) | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 66.66 | ||
| F Behardien | run out (Guptill/†BB McCullum) | 31 | 40 | 1 | 1 | 77.50 | ||
| DA Miller | run out (NL McCullum) | 14 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 58.33 | ||
| R McLaren | c Guptill b Franklin | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 40.00 | ||
| RK Kleinveldt | run out (Guptill) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | ||
| RJ Peterson | c NL McCullum b Mills | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | ||
| M Morkel | not out | 19 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 135.71 | ||
| LL Tsotsobe | b Neesham | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 112.50 | ||
| Extras | (w 4, nb 1) | 5 | ||||||
| Total | (10 wickets; 49.1 overs) | 252 | (5.12 runs per over) | |||||
| Fall of wickets 1-38 (de Kock, 8.2 ov), 2-167 (Smith, 30.2 ov), 3-174 (du Plessis, 31.4 ov), 4-180 (Ingram, 34.3 ov), 5-211 (Miller, 42.2 ov), 6-215 (McLaren, 43.6 ov), 7-216 (Kleinveldt, 44.2 ov), 8-224 (Behardien, 45.2 ov), 9-232 (Peterson, 46.2 ov), 10-252 (Tsotsobe, 49.1 ov) |
| Bowling | O | M | R | W | Econ | |||
| KD Mills | 9 | 2 | 28 | 2 | 3.11 | |||
| MJ McClenaghan | 10 | 0 | 51 | 0 | 5.10 | (2w) | ||
| NL McCullum | 10 | 0 | 56 | 1 | 5.60 | (1w) | ||
| KS Williamson | 3 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 7.33 | |||
| JEC Franklin | 10 | 0 | 52 | 1 | 5.20 | (1w) | ||
| JDS Neesham | 3.1 | 0 | 20 | 1 | 6.31 | |||
| GD Elliott | 4 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 5.75 | (1nb) |
| Match details |
| Toss South Africa, who chose to field |
| ODI debuts C Munro (New Zealand); F Behardien (South Africa) Player of the match tba |
| Umpires Aleem Dar (Pakistan) and JD Cloete TV umpire Enamul Haque (Bangladesh) Match referee DC Boon (Australia) Reserve umpire S George |
| Match notes |
|
January 22nd, 2013 at 22:16 SAST
Current partnership 11 runs, 0.4 overs, RR: 16.50 (Morkel 7, Tsotsobe 4)
we needed this from the 6th wicket partnership
January 22nd, 2013 at 22:16 SAST
Middle of our batting lot cost us, no urgency whatsoever
January 22nd, 2013 at 22:19 SAST
Flok Morkel…..
January 22nd, 2013 at 22:20 SAST
Just in…. how lazy was that
January 22nd, 2013 at 22:22 SAST
Fat lady is well up…. throat is cleared
January 22nd, 2013 at 22:23 SAST
Hulle try die rekord boeke haal met run outs
January 22nd, 2013 at 22:23 SAST
@ grootblousmile:
I think these guys don’t really expect to be able to win from here, so that’s why he was so lackadaisical…
January 22nd, 2013 at 22:23 SAST
29 needed off 8 balls…. never going to happen
January 22nd, 2013 at 22:24 SAST
107 @ The_Young_Turk:
Paar ouens se gatte moet hard geskop word
January 22nd, 2013 at 22:26 SAST
A boundary every ball is needed… and at least 2 will have to be 6′s
January 22nd, 2013 at 22:26 SAST
So just 5 sixes from 6 balls needed
January 22nd, 2013 at 22:26 SAST
Lopsie out, bowled
New Zealand win by 27 runs
January 22nd, 2013 at 22:27 SAST
Some New Zealanders will sleep better tonight
January 22nd, 2013 at 22:28 SAST
So guys, nice chatting to youse again. Till next time, keep the peckers up and at the ready!
Ciao a tutti!
January 22nd, 2013 at 22:30 SAST
@ The_Young_Turk:
111
3 sixes and 2 4s would have worked
Poor play SA
January 22nd, 2013 at 22:30 SAST
114 @ The_Young_Turk:
Tjorts!
I’m also out… gaan nou ‘n bed seermaak!
January 22nd, 2013 at 22:30 SAST
It’s been a difficult tour, but New Zealand have achieved something very significant here. They allowed South Africa back in the game, starting with the way Brendon McCullum got out, but Williamson saw them through to a competitive score, and New Zealand were far superior in the field during the chase. The players shake hands, South Africa will have to introspect, these are two games they could have won. Big smiles in the New Zealand camp. Lots of flak for their performances of late, but this should lift their spirits.
January 22nd, 2013 at 22:31 SAST
Cheers , let me get out too
January 22nd, 2013 at 22:32 SAST
118 @ superBul:
Tjorts!
January 23rd, 2013 at 07:54 SAST
Well done New Zealand.
January 23rd, 2013 at 08:04 SAST
First of all we should always respect the opposition and play our BEST and not rest players thinking we can send in a 2nd side and beat a team. That is showing zero respect and they gave it to us for sure. Hope Kirsteen has learned by this mistake.
Quite a few things cost us here. First it was Morkel being so damn expensive while bowling. Then we SHOULD have played Steyn and Kallis here. AB by picking up the two match ban cost us as well, the youngsters just never done much. We could have won this had Smith not got out by taken a extra run that was not really on. That was daft as we were cruising then. Then AGAIN Faf messing it up with a run that was clearly not on. If those two had batted on from where they were I feel we could have pulled off a win here. Just when a series is in the balance why the heck not play your best? We needed to win this game to square it up for the last game to come. The mind boggles with selection.
Another thing we missed Amla and I know he was injured just shows what a huge player he is.