Ask-Ads Left

Heyneke MeyerIt is dubiously called a “Test window” period anyway, and the Springboks must use the three weeks of international activity in June next year as a genuine window of opportunity to prepare themselves for more glamorous goals later in the season.

Our national side has a greatly less taxing, on paper, June agenda than either of their most traditional southern hemisphere rivals, New Zealand and Australia … and must use it to their advantage in terms of bigger-picture aspirations like the Castle Rugby Championship a bit further up the gruelling 2013 drag.


It was confirmed recently that the Boks’ initial obligations next year, during the now traditional June “gap” period in Super Rugby, will be as part of a four-nation tournament also featuring Scotland, Italy and Samoa.

They play Italy at the first-time location of Mbombela Stadium in Nelspruit on June 8, the Scots at Kings Park on June 15, and then a likely “final” – as they will be heavy tourney favourites – against one of the three other sides at Loftus on June 22, depending on the finishing pecking order.

With respect to the visiting trio, there is simply no comparison between South Africa’s June programme and the altogether stiffer itineraries laid out for fellow SANZAR giants the All Blacks and Wallabies.

The Samoans, who the Boks will hopefully play in the Loftus game for the sake of variety, are eternally hard-tackling and uncompromising, but like all the Pacific Island sides do struggle to be truly competitive at the set-piece against the bigger Test powers, particularly when they oppose them in their own strongholds.

The Italians and Scots, for their part, almost routinely occupy bottom-half slots on the Six Nations table — and Scotland’s last Test appearance of this year was a humiliating home defeat to Tonga!

World champions the All Blacks will play home Tests on three successive Saturdays against France, dangerous through their unpredictability at the best of times and seemingly back on an encouraging upward curve anyway.

All New Zealanders will know, with memories of the nail-biting (8-7) 2011 World Cup final still fresh on their minds, that the French will allow their hosts few luxuries in terms of experimentation or rotation – that might only come in game three, in the event that the All Blacks have already gone an unassailable 2-0 ahead in the series.

In some respects, Les Bleus had a more satisfying end-of-year period in 2012 than New Zealand did, considering that they won all their fixtures – including beating Australia by a consummate 33-6 and Argentina 39-22 – whereas the tiring All Blacks tripped up rather spectacularly against England at Twickenham.

The Wallabies, for their part, probably have it the toughest of the SANZAR powers in June (and for them early July, too) when they tackle the British and Irish Lions over three Tests – a once-every-12-years event for the big three of the “south” and a prestigious, money-spinning one never taken lightly.

So if the Boks play their cards correctly, they may be in the beneficial position of entering the second annual Rugby Championship, also featuring the Pumas, fresher than either the All Blacks or Wallabies.

Frankly, even at this faraway point there seems little sense in Bok coach Heyneke Meyer playing absolutely full-strength sides for all – or even any? – of the three June fixtures.

The “window” comes, after all, when many of the best Test candidates are already feeling the debilitating effects of many weeks of Super Rugby, and with the business end of that competition also immediately following the June internationals.

He may be maligned in some areas of his philosophy and game-plan but Meyer, to his credit, has always made it clear that he does not hand out Bok caps willy-nilly.

And while it may look as if that is what he did to some extent in his up-and-down first season in charge, the array of players he employed was much more related to a severe injury epidemic than to any knee-jerk reaction to adversity that was a hallmark, for instance, of the Rudolf Straeuli era when all sorts of sub-standard journeymen got Bok call-ups.

What Meyer did do judiciously, especially on the end-of-year tour, was establish a pretty decent “pool” of Test-quality players in various positions.

So when the time comes to play the relative minnows visiting our shores in June, he is not going to lose much in either strength or credibility if he first assesses volumes of Super Rugby game time by his personnel and then rotates them accordingly – probably without risking any serious danger of shock losses.

Let’s face it, even a properly-picked South Africa ‘A’ team could probably dispose of any of the Scots (minus a potential handful of Lions representatives, remember), Italians or Samoans very comfortably in our own habitat.

Meyer will know, for instance, that a suitably-firing Bok side should whip any of these three regardless of whether Beast Mtawarira or Gurthro Steenkamp is at loosehead prop, Andries Bekker or Juandre Kruger is in the No 5 jersey and Schalk Burger or Willem Alberts is at blindside flank.

Of course there is a case for fielding as “familiar” and settled a team as possible for most Tests, but the squad system is also a huge, inevitable part of the rugby landscape these days.

Unlike earlier this year, when Meyer was tackling his maiden series against credible foes England and quite obviously desired best possible troops, the June 2013 international spell does afford him the opportunity to cocoon, to some extent, key figures with a view to their being especially fresh and hungry for the Rugby Championship.

That is a blessing the All Blacks and Wallabies may not have …

10 Responses to Heyneke could still experiment in June

  • 1

    Yip, ideal time to tweak things a bit and also to work hard at a more ball-in-hand approach… but there is one more thing I’d like ALL South African sides in Super Rugby and at the Springboks to achieve in 2013… and that’s clearing the breakdown better and thus creating much faster and heavily increased quality ball to the backlines!

  • 2

    We just don’t hit the breakdowns in sufficient numbers and/or body positions. How many times in the Winter Tours were we not counter rucked by less players arriving at speed and correct body positions. Clearing out at the ruck is not only for your no4 lock.

  • 3

    How can bashing it up with the forwards and then getting the scrum or flyhalf to kick the ball away be experimenting?
    Or will HM allow the ball to go to the 12, who will bash it up?
    Or will HM allow his 15 to not kick every fucking ball away?

  • 4

    1 @ grootblousmile:
    Totally agree if we work on clearing the ball fast at the breakdown that allows our backs more into the game. We have to get there a lot faster than we done in the RC and eoyt. By not getting there faster and in numbers we put so much pressure on ourselves this year. Need to get there in numbers and blitz the opposition right off. Just look how fast England got there and they blitzed the ABs right back there, that allowed their backs to play and damn did they play some great rugby. Their forwards were like a well oiled machine, working fast and in numbers.If we do that the gaps are already there so no need to always kick the damn ball into the high heavens or use one of the forwards to bash it up. Keep ball in hand, we will be looking a dangerous team if we do that.

  • 5

    2 @ Lion4ever:

    Exactly. Though Alberts was clearing many rucks as well. They all can just look how England done it. Must be a team effort.

  • 6

    @ Puma:
    Two or three, hitting the rucks together makes a huge difference. Think if Eben and Alberts hit the ruck together. Will take some doing to resist and counter ruck.

  • 7

    4 @ Puma:
    I don’t think so much it’s about getting to the breakdowns faster, it’s more about blowing over and through rucks better and clearing over the ball better… better body positioning going into rucks, working as a tag-team together to clear the rucks, and possibly above all placing the ball better when going to ground so that clearing out is easier.

    One thing I noticed from the All Blacks in 2012, with the exception of their last game, was that anybody who was available behind the rucks (it need not have been the scrummie) was able to play in the scrummie position to distribute the fast ball with proper skill and accuracy – from props right down to fullback, whereas the Springboks tended to wait for Ruan Pienaar to arrive and he was almost the exclusive distributor behind rucks… well much more so than in the case of the All Blacks scrummie.

    That made their loose ball lightening quick and created space out wide with regularity…. it was almost always on to run!

  • 8

    Sir Graham Henry talks about the importance of a coach’s approach, a professional environment and the expectation of excellence…

    On expectation:

    “If the coach hasn’t got that expectation of high quality, you’re never going to get that from the players you coach”

    On the playing environment:

    “Every time they meet, there’s an environment that is stimulating, that they enjoy, which is going to develop them as individuals and players.”

  • 10

    Hennie Bekker interview


Bam Advert